I want the world to know that this is not practicing medicine. We go to the hospital for help - not to be murdered.
Evidence: Interview Recording
He was isolated, not allowed to have visitors. Staff encouraged me/him to call/facetime. He was so out of breath, talking on the phone and facetiming was impossible as he would be gasping for air. After being in the hospital for less than a day, he called to say that the doctor told him he wouldn't survive, and I still wasn't allowed to see him. There was misinformation given to me about the medications he was receiving. There was a delay in care in transferring him to ICU. There was limited visitation in ICU. A doctor even told me that if he coded again, after 2 rounds of CPR, he would stop because the first rule is "do no harm." while in ICU, the doctors were not forthcoming with his prognosis.
On Sept 10, 2021, I took my husband, Jamie, to the ER 3 min away from our home to get an inhaler/ivermectin for COVID-19. His oxygen sats were in the 80’s and he was rushed to the back. I was asked to leave because he tested positive for COVID-19. They never informed me that I wouldn’t be allowed to see him again.
He was transferred to a hospital 45 min away from our home. He was isolated on the COVID-19 ward, and was not allowed to have visitors. The staff kept saying to facetime/call him, but he didn’t have enough breath support to talk. He texted me the next day and the doc told him he wouldn’t survive. Looking back, the doctors had given up before they even tried to save him.
On 9/11, I went to the hospital for answers; finally the nurse supervisor came outside to talk to me. I asked her about the monocolonal antibodies, Regeneron, where she misinformed me and said that the hospital uses another brand, remdesivir. Remdesivir is an antiviral not antibodies.
On 09/12, i finally heard from a doctor that told me no visitors. On 9/18, Dr. Greenberg called and wouldn’t allow visitors be cause COVID-19 could be transmitted on clothes. By 2021, this myth had been disproven. On 09/19 a.m., my husband texted and was begging me to get him out of the hospital because he was tied up. The nurse told me he had fallen and was restrained. i couldn’t calm him down over the phone.
On Wednesday morning, 09/22 at 7 a.m., Jamie texted me that he was being moved to ICU. When i called the nurse to verify, the nurse was waiting on a decision to be made. At 1:00 p.m., they were still waiting. This was a delay in care. At 3:00 p.m., Jamie texted again and said he was being moved. At 5 p.m., I was notified that he was being placed on a Bipap and would possibly need a ventilator. At 5:30 p.m. in traffic, while on my way to the hospital 45 minutes away from our home, I was called saying they needed to place him on a ventilator and he was refusing until I could get there. All of this could have been streamlined had they let me stay with him/visit from the beginning and if they would not have had a delay in care earlier in the day.
Once he was vented, they would finally allowed me to visit, but only for 2-hour intervals 2 times a day. Initially, he was making progress, then they increased the baricitinib and decreased the steroid. Back and forth with weaning vent, and adding sedative, paralytics. On 10/8 at 3:30 p.m., they called to say that his heart rate was going down and they were required to start CPR. They told me the nurse was placing ice on his body for a fever when she noticed his pulse dropping and she thought it was the ice, not realizing that it was a medical emergency. This was another delay in care.
On 10/10, as i was walking in ICU for visitation, they started CPR again and doc was pressuring me for a DNR. That’s when he told me that the first rule of care is to do no harm and if there is another need for CPR, then he would call time of death after 2 rounds of CPR. I felt the doctors had given up and were wanting us to sign a DNR so they wouldn’t have to keep trying. I later found out that the staff in the ICU at the hospital were mostly traveling nurses with little complex medical experience being unable to care for an ICU patient.
Hospitals were hiring incompetent staff to treat COVID-19 patients, and were receiving the extra incentives from the government for treating COVID-19 patients. Again on 10/13 while i was waiting for his neurology appointment, his pulse started to go down and they started CPR. I had a feeling that the staff lowered his medication because they knew he was brain dead and the medications were keeping him alive. I believe the medications were intentionally lowered while I was present at the hospital to force a need for CPR in front of me for a 2nd time.
Ultimately, my soul-mates’s date of death was 10/13/2021.
This is one of many stories we have documented for our COVID-19 Humanity Betrayal Memory Project, a living archive of individuals harmed by crimes against humanity under pretext of COVID policies, protocols, and mandates. If you have a story you would like to share, please submit it here. You can browse more documented cases below. If you feel this is important, please share this page to your social media pages – and since it will probably be censored from social media, take the extra step of emailing it to your friends and family. Thank you for helping us raise awareness about all COVID-related crimes against humanity.
Please share this story to help raise awareness
Testimony Clips 18
The following clips were extracted from James V. Lamb, III's recorded testimony interview. Each captures a key moment relevant to one or more of the 25 documented COVID protocol commonalities.
“"at that point, he was on fifteen liters of oxygen, and they had started giving him the, remdesivir. So I was asking about the monoclonal antibodies, the Regeneron, and the the nurse told me that they don't do that there... Jamie was now on forty liters of oxygen via two sources.”
“"They weren't trying. They weren't doing anything. They had disconnected the vent, and they were back using the ambu bag to bag him. But it it wasn't the correct ratio of breath resuscitation breaths. So I knew that it was it was all show that it wasn't... they weren't really performing CPR on him.”
“"I do, feel like there was at one point, they restrained him during the night, and they said because he was a fall risk, but they they couldn't confirm if he fell. They couldn't confirm, you know, why they felt they they needed to restrain him.”
“"...telling me that there is a resurge of the COVID and that his respiratory function had declined. So I'm not like, that just absolutely made no sense to me because people were getting COVID, getting better...”
“"when they would notice that he was starting to try to bite the suction tube, instead of letting me, you know, having me letting me be there as much as possible, they were restricting me to visiting hours. So then they when I wasn't there and he would get agitated like that, they would just increase his paralytic. I mean, increase his sedatives. And then they would tell me they would have to give him extra sedatives, so that they could because of the the agitation. I feel like had they allowed me to be in in the room to be able to give him that that sense of comfort of just no just sensing that knowing that your loved one is there. All a lot of that could have been avoided.”
“"They were keeping him sedated a lot and kept saying they wanted to extubate him, but when they you just would end up just paralyzing and sedating him more instead of trying to do the excavation.”
Showing 6 of 18 clips. Browse all clips by commonality →